|
Post by doctornolonger on Sept 5, 2022 10:37:54 GMT
War has broken out across the Spiral Politic – in fact, it broke out 50 years ago! Welcome to week 1 of the Book Club of the War 🥳 If you’re just joining us, please see the Announcement and Reading Schedule for all the details you need to know. This week we’re discussing The Core Entries: - Causalities of War (p. 2-5)
- Spiral Politic (p. 183-185)
- Great Houses (p. 77-79)
- House Military (p. 91-94)
- Celestis (p. 30-32)
- Faction Paradox (p. 57-62) and “Faction Paradox Family” (p. 59-61)
- Remote (p. 165-167)
- Lesser Species (p. 111-112)
- Yssgaroth (p. 227-229)
(A few people have asked me about navigating the book, and hopefully the page numbers above will help. (I cannot condone piracy, but for anyone using the bootlegged epub, it’s as easy as scrolling back through the entry you just read to find the next entry’s link!)) Some food for thought, to get things started: - There are a ton of ideas in these entries, from “shooting star worlds” to timeships’ understanding of distance. What stood out to you?
- This section introduces the major players of the War. Many of these have close parallels from the universe of Dr Who (and many of us are Who fans). How are these described differently than their Dr Who counterparts?
- Anything else I should include in these weekly threads? Let me know!
Next week we’ll discuss The History of the Faction Paradox!
|
|
|
Post by scottxwl on Sept 5, 2022 14:05:48 GMT
First and most importantly, thank you so much for starting and organizing this!
I've been a Doctor Who fan my whole life (currently 50 years old) and I've been aware of Faction Paradox as this... complicated corner of the Doctor Who fandom. I've always meant to jump in, but never got around to it. But this project finally inspired me.
I think my first question is: do you all think of this as the actual Doctor Who universe? Or something completely separate, inspired by, but not overlapping?
One of the things the struck me when reading this week's entries was in the section about The Remote. It talked about The Remote project was an attempt to not only breed troops, but create symbols, "planting new loa among the human societies and watching them grow." It made me think that maybe *our* universe is the Faction Paradox universe, and Doctor Who, as a show, is an idea planted in our world to get us used to the ideas of the real universe out there.
I like how this writing style describes the ideas and actions of the Faction Paradox universe. It's like it's using our limited language to describe things that are on a fundamental level *unknowable*. This, to me, is the best way to describe/not really describe the Time War. I haven't listened to any of the Big Finish audios concerning it, but between the show and some of the books, it's starting to feel a little too "knowable." I liked back in series one when it was described is causing the universe to shake, and yet being unseen by lesser species.
My final thought for now is I appreciate the Lovecraftian-ness of the Yssgaroth. Reminds me of the creature from Russell T Davies' book Damaged Goods.
So excited to be doing this!
|
|
Anastasia
Cousin
Liberating the oppressed of the Houses and toppling regimes.
Posts: 154
Preferred Pronouns: She/They
|
Post by Anastasia on Sept 5, 2022 17:22:45 GMT
I think my first question is: do you all think of this as the actual Doctor Who universe? Or something completely separate, inspired by, but not overlapping? in my opinion both. It is all part of the Metafiction of the series. It plays with the idea that is is Fiction. the Doctor was the Renegade who went to try and stop the war of Dronid and died and and thus the Story disposed of one Metanarrative (Doctor Who) in exchange for and another (Faction Paradox (the series) and by killing the main character they severed themselves from the show which birthed it. Yet the Doctor or any other Doctor Shaped holes won’t stay dead and stop interfering with the War. One whole of note shows up of Leth and kills a bunch of Lobotomised Renegades. It is the Same Universe but not they same Metanarrative, this is not. Doctor Who, Doctor Who dead, this is Faction Paradox. this is not the Same History the anchoring of one (the Doctor) and been replaced by a a new one (the War)
|
|
Bongo50
Little Sibling
Currently reading The Book of the War
Posts: 44
|
Post by Bongo50 on Sept 5, 2022 18:44:29 GMT
I've really enjoyed this weeks entries. I found the description of the Great Houses to be pretty cool. I feel that they're described as more mysterious and unknowable than the Time Lords are in Doctor Who and I like that a lot. The Remote are also a really cool concept. It feels like a commentary on how interconnected the modern world is with influencers being large idols in the younger generations, but taken to the next level. I do feel that, if society continues on its current course, we could end up in a situation like is described. One of the things the struck me when reading this week's entries was in the section about The Remote. It talked about The Remote project was an attempt to not only breed troops, but create symbols, "planting new loa among the human societies and watching them grow." It made me think that maybe *our* universe is the Faction Paradox universe, and Doctor Who, as a show, is an idea planted in our world to get us used to the ideas of the real universe out there. I love this idea so much. I also liked the description of the Spiral Politic and the way it is mapped. Things such as the shooting star worlds feel really cool and inventive. All in all, reading in this order is so much more accessible than reading in alphabetical order. It feels much more natural and consecutive entries feel much more linked. I also like how there are entries that have been linked a few times but that we haven't gotten to yet, building a sense of anticipation. Even just within this week's entries, Yssgaroth was linked a lot before I reached its entry and so, by the time I did, I was very excited to find out what it actually is. I'm looking forward to starting on The History of the Faction Paradox!
|
|
|
Post by Aristide Twain on Sept 5, 2022 19:10:19 GMT
I think my first question is: do you all think of this as the actual Doctor Who universe? Or something completely separate, inspired by, but not overlapping? I think I must begin by stating firmly: people who seriously propose that The Book of the War inhabits a different-but-similar universe from Alien Bodies, Interference and The Taking of Planet 5 should check their hind brains for fiendish biodata viruses pay close attention to future installments of this Book Club. Over and over, entries in the Book reference and sequelise the War EDAs, as opposed to rebooting them in a Doctor-less context as one would expect from the “separate universes” approach. By implication, this makes the whole of the Classic Series, plus at least some of the Wilderness Years books, “applicable” to the Faction Paradox universe. What one wants to call this situation, though, is entirely a matter of point of view. I am rather fond of the framing that it's not Faction Paradox that is a part of the Doctor Who Universe, it is Doctor Who that is a part of the Faction Paradox Universe; it is FP that reveals, at last, the true magnitude and cosmology of the universe that Doctor Who fans see only in contradictory fragments, missing the forest of the War for the tree of the adventures of a single lackadaisical Homeworld Renegade. So, for example, it is not the Great Houses that are “secretly” the Time Lords — it is the boring old Time Lords who were, secretly, members of the momentous Great Houses this whole time, and yet we never knew! Additionally, just because we accept everything that Miles & Co. had to work with in 2001 doesn't mean we have to accept subsequent developments. Figuring out cunning master-theories to incorporate NuWho (and the shadow NuWho retroactively casts on the modern understanding of Classic Who) into the FP cosmology, the fun with timelines and oxbows and bottles and all the rest, is amusing; but perhaps in literary terms it is clearer to think of “the FP Universe” and “the post-2005 Doctor Who Universe” as two different developments expanding outwards in different directions from the same base. We should not be afraid to consider the view that the on-screen events of (say) Pyramids of Mars are “true” in both the FP Universe and the Modern Doctor Who Universe, separately, with different underlying lore. Personally I am too fond of dot-joining to embrace that point of view, but I think it deserves more breathing space as the more sustainable middle-ground between a radical “the Great Houses are not Time Lords” (which is absurd) and an equally-radical “yes John Hurt's Dr. Who somehow exists within the FP timeline, somewhere", which I admit does have the potential to chafe.
|
|
|
Post by doctornolonger on Sept 5, 2022 19:19:58 GMT
I think my first question is: do you all think of this as the actual Doctor Who universe? Or something completely separate, inspired by, but not overlapping? Welcome Scott, and thank you for joining in! Part of the reason I wanted to run this book club is that I'm hoping for a "fresh look" at The Book at the 20th anniversary of its release, as if I was reading it for the first time, separate from everything that’s built up since. Fans have certainly settled into a consensus – as Anastasia articulated above – that this is "the same universe without the Doctor's metanarrative" – and there are very good reasons to believe that; but sticking to that consensus too dogmatically might lead one to overlook the many interesting bits of evidence pointing elsewhere. For instance, one line that stood out to me: Wouldn't this catastrophic process change the history and culture of the enemy homeworld just as much as the rest of the continuum? Are these Great Houses really the Time Lords of the TV show? If the enemy had already won … how would we know? Would we?
|
|
Bongo50
Little Sibling
Currently reading The Book of the War
Posts: 44
|
Post by Bongo50 on Sept 5, 2022 20:09:02 GMT
Are these Great Houses really the Time Lords of the TV show? If the enemy had already won … how would we know? Would we? Wow, this is such a cool idea. Is there any evidence elsewhere to support this?
|
|
|
Post by Aristide Twain on Sept 5, 2022 20:20:18 GMT
Similar ideas have been played with in many subtle ways elsewhere in FP. For example, in a twist on the same semiotics, I think there is an implication you can easily read into Dead Romance that perhaps the Time Lords have been fleeing down the ladder of bottle universes for a long time; that the Gallifrey we know was formerly some other planet that they terraformed into a Homeworld-duplicate. There is far too much emphasis on how unrecognisable Christine's Earth becomes overnight, and the depiction of the remainder of humanity scrabbling in the dark and in the cracks of the new masters, returning to prehistoric levels of civlisation, is perhaps the most interesting gonzo theory of the Outsiders and/or Shabogans yet devised.
|
|
Anastasia
Cousin
Liberating the oppressed of the Houses and toppling regimes.
Posts: 154
Preferred Pronouns: She/They
|
Post by Anastasia on Sept 5, 2022 20:59:52 GMT
I would like to add something I found interesting, not a big thing, in fact I don’t think that it’s important at all but I did notice that in the Faction Paradox article it describes them as doing the things they because to them it is a Carnival, and the imagery describes the faction calls to mind the Carnival seen in “Christmas on a Rational Planet”. I always imagined the Faction not worshiping but follow the ideas of the Carnival Queen (weather they know so or not but I am pretty sure the the Grandfather, if they existed that is, did Nick a few ideals from her) but if they ever got close to what they claimed to want (The Carnival, and universe in which they are the Lords of Paradox) they would chicken out, it would get far to real far to quick for them (well maybe not Morlock). i. Would like to add that I do not fully interpret the Faction this way seeing as their are many ways to interpretation them I try to see them from every angle this one is just one I am rather fond of.
|
|
|
Post by brunojclwho on Sept 5, 2022 21:22:00 GMT
I can't get it out of my head that Celestis and The Division are the same. I know the Celestis are "Gods" who have achieved their "Final Ascension", but The Division feels similar to me. They don't care about Destroying entire Planets in The Flux, they think they're Gods, Gallifrey was destroyed, and theoretically they didn't participate in the War, but they wanted to chase the Doctor because she would "get in the way" (something like that, it's been a long time since I saw that Era). For me, The Division is perhaps a future version of the CIA (same as Celestis)>
The way the Celestis became "Gods" just like the Eternals and Celestials, It reminded me of The End of Time, and how Rassilon and the Time Lords wanted to ascend as Gods.
on the part of: "It should be noted that on the Great House Spiral maps, there are marked areas that do not seem to correspond to any known planets. It has been speculated that they may in fact be people, individuals Such blinding historical importance that, when mapped, they appear larger than entire worlds." I remembered a certain renegade renegade traveling in a blue police phone booth. (And I remembered Celestial Intervention - A Gallifrey Noir)
I like the "mythical" way the Time Lords are treated here, and not just mere fake politicians.
|
|
leahhh
Little Sibling
Posts: 36
|
Post by leahhh on Sept 5, 2022 22:01:24 GMT
This line from "Casualties of War" stood out to me:
There's this idea that the Enemy is less a single entity or race than it is the very concept of opposition to the Great Houses. (I forget if this comes up later in the Book or if it originated elsewhere, but I guess we'll see.) This line cast kind of a new light on that concept for me. It's almost as if, from the moment the Homeworld began to prepare for war, the Spiral Politic began to be replaced with a new War Spiral, in which case every maneuver the Houses make to preserve their position only hastens the change.
|
|
leahhh
Little Sibling
Posts: 36
|
Post by leahhh on Sept 5, 2022 22:33:00 GMT
(second post for a second subject) Rereading the "Yssgaroth" entry, I appreciated the language used to describe them. They're not just vampires or spooky Great Old One-esque beings, they're a horrific unfathomable force of pain and torture - I could really believe they're an existential threat to the universe. I was interested in the question of whether there's one Yssgaroth or many. We're told that: - "It's known that only one of the Yssgaroth managed to tear its way into the continuum, on the Homeworld itself"
- "It's possible the Yssgaroth is just one mass capable of splitting itself up"
- many "servants" of the Yssgaroth also entered the universe
- the servants might be "small fragments of its mass, or the genuine gigantic, misshapen inhabitants of the Yssgaroth universe"
So, I'm led to ask: If they might all be fragments of the same entity, why is the Book so confident that the one on the Homeworld was the "only one"? Was it distinct in other ways than size?
Are we supposed to understand that this Homeworld Yssgaroth was the King Vampire? TARDIS Wiki says that Interference (presumably a relevant source) says that Omega thought the King was just another servant.
If the Yssgaroth isn't a single mass, and the Homeworld Yssgaroth is different from the "servants", what does it mean to say the servants are "the genuine inhabitants of the Yssgaroth universe"? What does that make the Homeworld Yssgaroth?
|
|
|
Post by Aristide Twain on Sept 5, 2022 22:41:07 GMT
Tardis Wiki says that Interference (presumably a relevant source) says that Omega thought the King was just another servant. It does imply as much, although it's worth nothing that this entire flashback is a vision created by Faction Paradox and is explicitly unreliable in some respects, including the Faction trying to fabricate a role for themselves in this era of history where they, of course, didn't actually exist yet. And the entire sequence of dialogue where the idea of the King Vampire being distinct from the “true Yssgaroth” is bound up in that aspect of the conversation. Here is the relevant extract, “the Engineer” being, of course, Omega: In any case: If the Yssgaroth isn't a single mass, and the Homeworld Yssgaroth is different from the "servants", what does it mean to say the servants are "the genuine inhabitants of the Yssgaroth universe"? What does that make the Homeworld Yssgaroth? Without necessarily going all the way with the idea of the Yssgaroth as their dimension's Great Houses, it may be helpful to think of the Homeworld Yssgaroth as the only "Yssgaroth Lord", and of the servants as something like the Cwejen.
|
|
|
Post by desertkris on Sept 5, 2022 23:01:25 GMT
I've always like the meta aspect of FP storylines, although I don't know if I ever feel ready to let myself go down the rabbit hole head first. I get the sense of a tug-of-war over the idea of fetishizing aspects of FP, or DW. FP emerged out of elements of Alien Bodies, elements that I was really interested in seeing have life beyond the scope of DW stories. To some extent, though, I resent the idea that FP avoids embracing this aspect of itself. I like the idea of it developing it's own identity, but I feel like part of that involves sacrificing so much of what gets it started, that it makes it ghost-like and un-recognizable. I recently read an article that speculates about the idea of FP jettisoning it's DW DNA makes it hard for it to take-off, while allowing for DW elements is akin to rejecting Sydney Newman's declaration of "No bug-eyed monsters!" Looking at the Spiral Politic entry, which is a fantastic verbal map of the FP universe, I am struck by the mechanics of worlds shifting their location as war-priority worlds. But also there's the fun bit about how there are non-worlds that have a large presence in the map of the war, that might be people (but it's hard to imagine one person being so big!). Given FP as a fictional world where meta-fiction is a major theme, or a major re-occurring story element that gets re-visited over and over, this makes me think of the practice of storytelling, and something a Star Trek author once commented on. We can look at two parallel examples of what's actually important within a fictional world; a main character: The Doctor, or Mr. Spock.
On a meta-level, it never occurred to me to look at Gallifrey as a storytelling element which is used in service to the character of The Doctor, and is important in how it impacts on The Doctor's ongoing adventures/story. Gallifrey isn't important in itself, it is only important and developed as a culture to inform us about the Doctor.
Similarly with Mr. Spock, the planet Vulcan, and any cultures or rituals or social norms that are shown on Vulcan up to a point where solely to develop the character of Spock. It was weird to go back and watch episodes of the old shows, and think about how an entire planet's culture and history and aesthetic fluctuates or gets added to, for the sake of one character. Think about how in the first Star Trek movie, Spock is rejecting his emotions and humanity before he embraces them at the end, so all of a sudden the planet Vulcan gets a whole new religious movement that takes the "no-emotion, maximize logic" to an extreme degree, but only because that is what one character needs. The whole planet gets come marital/relationship practices and rituals, because of how the character of Spock needs to be developed and explored in Amok Time. The idea of a non-world being so massively important as a war-priority, and that a non-world might even be a single individual, looks very different with that kind of behind-the-curtain writers' secrets perspective in mind. Talking broadly about the Faction Paradox entry, and the organization itself. How many others who have read Christmas on a Rational Planet agree with the post above that the mention of the word "Carnival" is not an accident, but deliberately calls to mind the chaotic nature of the universe before a structure and order is imposed on it? I agree, it evokes that book, and makes me think of the chaotic possibilities and consequences of CoaRP. One thing that is a little embarrassing is that I never picked up on a slightly disdainful tone that Alien Bodies and FP kind of has about it's political factions. I was fascinated by the idea of counter-culturalists and...devil-worshipers of Gallifrey/The Great Houses. I was less fascinated about the type of people that end up in those kinds of groups, and more interested in the anthropological idea of it. So I too easily dismissed just how mean spirited Brother Manuele is, and that Cousin Justine's self-presentation of dignified, otherworldly mystique collapses in the face of physical violence, and Manuele's base desire for Cousin Justine. I never picked up on the shabbiness that was there at the beginning, until I more recently re-read Alien Bodies. One of my more recent visitations to the Book of War left me feeling a little dismayed to realize that Faction Paradox are cast in the framework of the saying history repeating itself, first as tragedy, then as farce. And to look beyond the scope of FP and imagine the Eremites/(Cenobites from Hellraiser?) as the original version, and Faction Paradox as the pathetic joke version that came after. I've only ever watched clips of Hellraiser, and read synopsis, to compare to the idea of Faction Paradox as a less-intense version. Or maybe we should reflect on Hellraiser as how intense the chaos of the Carnival Queen's universe would be experienced? I know this is getting ahead of things just a little bit... As The Great Houses are concerned, in the vein of trying to shake my thoughts out of looking for DW parallels/correspondences, I took note of a couple of interesting ideas. One is that they are de-emphasized as having been one species, suggesting that they are actually a collection of several different species. The pictures in the book show clearly depictions of ones who look like humanity, and the idea of them as having made themselves at one with space-time, and considered as gods, is similar to the idea of how we as humans like to personify everything, even elements of the world, in our image. The idea that we imagined the wind as being like us, or the ocean and being having a life-force that is relatably human, until we declared these concepts as gods and tried to beg, plead, and make bargains with these concepts, in hopes that they are alive, do understand us, and would be merciful. The Book of the War presents the Great Houses as being in our image.
I was also intrigued by The Great Houses entry's talk about the timeships, which are emphasized as more organic. In discussing the timeships, briefly, it skips the basic of "yes, they travel in time", I almost want to read it as, "well, that's how you humans would perceive it, as a machine for traveling through time, so of course you would view such machines as timeships.
The entry talks more about how the timeship machines: --aren't vessels (vehicles?) --are described as more biological than we might expect (when thinking of a TARDIS) --they are more for re-writing the biodata of a child of the Great Houses, and
--reprocessing their own futures.
So these ideas are something I could be interesting in understanding in a new way, alien to DW. It's interesting to compare the above description to the post-human realms, with the pilots of the Coteries (which I've seen compared to the navigators of Dune). It's hard for me to try and reconceptualize the Great Houses timeships without some of these crutches, so if we look at the idea of time travel as not-time travel, and we accept the posthuman non-time travel as being akin to the prescient humans of the Dune-universe navigating and choosing deliberate pathways through the possible futures. This makes it seem like humans might be reacting to changes that they perceive through race-memory or ancestral memory that can be tapped into, rather than traveling back through time to the past...and the Great Houses are reacting/fighting against post-humanity's ability to read changes in their cellular memory, changes to their history, and adjust their culture and laws to close off the Great Houses's future pathways with a cultural wall that ends their (the Great House's)cultural influence.
|
|
cousinunseen
Little Sibling
Posts: 18
Preferred Pronouns: she/they
|
Post by cousinunseen on Sept 5, 2022 23:37:18 GMT
Currently on the Celestis Entry so far. I have to agree with one of the commentators that the description of the Spiral Politic as a map of history with planets that move and collide with one another is really great as a visual. Tempted to try and animate it almost like the animated segments in Monument Mythos.
|
|