|
Post by brunojclwho on Sept 9, 2022 15:04:41 GMT
Wow, this is such a cool idea. Is there any evidence elsewhere to support this? Hm, three things come to mind which could be explained by this: - The Time Lords appear to be using a significantly different writing system by the Ninth Doctor's time.
- In series 3 and The End of Time, the Seal of Rassilon isn't present on Time Lord collars or costumes (not even on Rassilon's), though circular Gallifreyan symbols/writing do feature on the costumes. By the time of The Day of the Doctor, the Seal has (retroactively) reappeared.
- There's a rather surprising number of children suddenly on Gallifrey in The Day of the Doctor.
Sure there are writing and production reasons for this, but perhaps we as the audience are watching the history and culture of the new homeworld (enemy homeworld or otherwise) change and settle into its new role. (And thanks to this discussion, I'm coming to believe circular Gallifreyan isn't the writing system of the Great Houses.)
This does then bring up the thought (and maybe an off-topic one!) of whether the Last Great Time War even involved the Great Houses at all.
Me, I have a guess, though I don't know whether either man ever intended it. Much is made in Lungbarrow of the forty-five Cousins quota that Lungbarrow must adhere to. What if, just maybe, Dr Who only exists because the Grandfather erased himself from history — because his erasure left a vacant 45th spot into which the Other's biodata-ghost was able to slip unnoticed? Beyond enjoying this idea, I also wanted to express my appreciation for calling the character Dr Who. It's valid and correct and by jiminy I will die on that hill. interesting... but how could this be elaborated? sincerely, I believe that maybe this can be explained just like The Time Lords having Different Costumes and Styles. (I just saw some images, and apparently the Gallifreyan Round Symbols are there in both The End of Time, The Time of the Doctor and others. It's probably just clothes and styles with fewer symbols, so it doesn't necessarily mean it's another Gallifrey or something) 1Note: Okay, I just reread your post and apparently you're right about the appearance of the symbols. (I'm using Google Translate, and sometimes I miss something)
|
|
leahhh
Little Sibling
Posts: 36
|
Post by leahhh on Sept 9, 2022 16:15:14 GMT
The Frontios frontier in time is very much a concern here as well. I've always appreciated the way FP uses Frontios here. It's an episode one might not think of as influential, but it does introduce some pretty intriguing ideas about the relationship between the Time Lords, humanity, and the far future.
|
|
PI9090
Cousin
I was loomed this way.
Posts: 91
|
Post by PI9090 on Sept 10, 2022 14:04:01 GMT
Quite how the Grandfather fits into the Plattian family tree is an interesting question; he is of the War King's, and thus Theta Sigma's, generation, but I definitely don't think he's any one of the Cousins we know about from Lungbarrow itself. Me, I have a guess, though I don't know whether either man ever intended it. Much is made in Lungbarrow of the forty-five Cousins quota that Lungbarrow must adhere to. What if, just maybe, Dr Who only exists because the Grandfather erased himself from history — because his erasure left a vacant 45th spot into which the Other's biodata-ghost was able to slip unnoticed? Brilliant. My own personal retcon is that the symbol change is pure politicking, it seems Rassilon has done an Imperatrix and abolished the Chapters then gave them all a single symbol, (probably an update of the Intuitive Revelation symbol) to unite around. There are a few lines in the book that either imply or outright state natural childbirth returned at some point within the first 50 years. The Time Lords appear to be using a significantly different writing system by the Ninth Doctor's time. Again it's my own personal headcanon but circular Gallifreyan is Timelords only as it can change causality, (see Auetur), that during the War it was more openly used out of necessity, and after .T.L.G.T.W. the Doctor simply decided to switch to it as a reminder of home, (plus it's not as if anyone else could understand it so it allows him to lie about things). Whereas the previously seen linear Gallifreyan, (Middle and Assassin's) is the common system used for everything else, (especially in the civilian cities) so as to both avoid any unintended causality manipulations, 9 (would you want he universe reshapened by a children's story or a laundry list?) and to help protect Timelord secrets. It did, but those of Rassilon's Gallifrey 6 and it's cloneworlds, (NuWho) not those of either Gallifrey 1 and 8 depending on how you see it, (Classic Who).
|
|
|
Post by quicksilverkitling on Sept 10, 2022 22:02:34 GMT
Straightforward answers aren't BotW's strongest suit! And maybe its eagerness to show the reader multiple points of view at once is one of its strengths. Absolutely! I really love that side of it -- it makes it feel more like an actual academic text, with the occasional differences in accepted facts. Which in turn makes the Spiral Politic feel far more real, albeit in a pretty metafictional way!
|
|
|
Post by quicksilverkitling on Sept 10, 2022 22:13:57 GMT
My main thought about the entries as I read them was simply the sense that the concepts being described were beyond human understanding. None of us can really picture what an idea clinging to the outer skin of the universe would look like, or the exact relationship between the Spiral Politic and a geographical map of space, but through prose it's possible to describe them in a way that sort of makes sense.
Which I guess is one huge strength of the written word. The idea of trying to adapt the Book of the War into an audio-visual format boggles the mind...
|
|
ray
Little Sibling
We are not amused.
Posts: 5
|
Post by ray on Sept 11, 2022 5:31:33 GMT
Who's writing the Book of the War from the Watsonian perspective, anyway? Is it Eremites
|
|
ray
Little Sibling
We are not amused.
Posts: 5
|
Post by ray on Sept 11, 2022 9:41:18 GMT
Yssgaroth-vulnerable weak points are encased in planets. I think this explains Inferno; there is green goo beneath the skin of the Earth, and it makes people into something monstrous.
|
|
|
Post by garyshots on Sept 11, 2022 10:33:19 GMT
Yssgaroth-vulnerable weak points are encased in planets. I think this explains Inferno; there is green goo beneath the skin of the Earth, and it makes people into something monstrous. Is the one in Earth a weak point, or is it the Caldera from the original Homeworld, hidden there by Great Houses technosorcery for unaccountable cosmic reasons? I don't know, I'm just wondering.
|
|
|
Post by Aristide Twain on Sept 11, 2022 12:24:07 GMT
Yssgaroth-vulnerable weak points are encased in planets. I think this explains Inferno; there is green goo beneath the skin of the Earth, and it makes people into something monstrous. Right on. This is also hinted more directly in Interference. garyshots, all this material is protean enough to bear such identifications, but at a surface level I don't think we're meant to conflate rifts into the Spiral Yssgaroth with the actual Caldera(s).
|
|
|
Post by doctornolonger on Sept 11, 2022 16:09:20 GMT
Who's writing the Book of the War from the Watsonian perspective, anyway? Is it EremitesI think “Causalities of War” gave us an early clue: ”For obvious reasons this current volume is most concerned with humanity.” Yssgaroth-vulnerable weak points are encased in planets. I think this explains Inferno; there is green goo beneath the skin of the Earth, and it makes people into something monstrous. It took me way too long to realize that the beasts in Inferno – and, by corollary, the beastly Earth Reptiles in Adolescence of Time – were Mal’akh. I doubt that’s what Miles had in mind when he introduced the babewyns in Adventuress!
|
|
|
Post by Aristide Twain on Sept 11, 2022 16:20:30 GMT
I think “Causalities of War” gave us an early clue: ”For obvious reasons this current volume is most concerned with humanity.” Or does it? Strictly speaking, all that tells us is that the book is intended to be read by humans, not necessarily that humans wrote it (or, rather — humans in whose employ, precisely?). Posthumanity, the Enemy fishing for Reps, and Compassion's loosely-defined “side” in the War all feel like plausible candidates on the face of it, and that's before we go into the possibility of one of the sides who seemingly don't come off so well in the Book, like the Houses, being engaged in some sort of complex reverse psychology. I doubt that’s what Miles had in mind when he introduced the babewyns in Adventuress! Oh, so? Why not?
|
|
|
Post by doctornolonger on Sept 11, 2022 16:38:28 GMT
I doubt that’s what Miles had in mind when he introduced the babewyns in Adventuress! Oh, so? Why not? I’d elaborate, but it’d be getting quite ahead of ourselves, wouldn’t it, for the purpose of this thread, at least? I want these threads to stay on topic, ie “discussing what we just read”, rather than some “flexing FP lore knowledge” contest (which I’m as guilty of as anyone). Some questions can and should stay open-ended, especially at a stage as early as this one, so new readers can discover answers by themselves rather than one of us shooting down their speculations up front, which is just no fun. Maybe in the next thread I’ll include more specific spoiler instructions.
|
|
|
Post by Aristide Twain on Sept 11, 2022 16:51:25 GMT
Ah, fair enough.
|
|
|
Post by constonks on Sept 18, 2022 16:03:52 GMT
"It's fair to say history is no longer a safe place in which to live." Alright. Finally reading The Book of the War! Warning - this one’s going to be a long post!! First of all, I’m loving it so far. I’m coming at it having watched/read/listened to a whole lot of Who, but only two stories that have involved the Faction ( Alien Bodies & Unnatural History). So I’ll start off with some comparisons and contrasts with the mainstream Who world that stood out to me: - I don’t think the War really works as a “post-Time War” distant-future event simply because the Book says the only prior time war was the one against the Yssgaroth. And timing-wise, I think it’s safe to say that the War fills the same temporal niche as the Last Great Time War - ie. sometime late in the Eighth Doctor’s life - even if the exact nature of the relation between the Wars is open for debate.
- Apparently, the Great Houses found the idea of a military ridiculous before. But when we see a pre-series Doctor in Listen, his family members are wondering if he might go into the military. Perhaps when the Homeworld saw a need for a military, it retroactively placed one in its own history.
- The "casts" are the Shaydes from the DWM comics, I assume.
- "All the children of the houses would be involved" brings to mind All Hands on Deck.
- I remember seeing a tumblr post years ago that compared Entarodora's non-hominid form to a Dalek, paired with Cass from NOTD asking "who can tell the difference" between Daleks and Time Lords... (And apparently that post was by doctornolonger !)
- The Houses call the workings of history "equations", while the Faction calls them entities - and FP is right to some extent, as Death, Time, Pain all exist as beings in the DWU.
- The War universe has no parallels - just a changing timeline with a few bubble dimensions like E-Space. This is a pretty big difference from the way the Doctor Who Universe works, as per Inferno, but it might just be a matter of perspective.
- Small sub-universes bud in artificially-aged areas of the Spiral (which makes me wonder what’s been happening on Kembel), indicating the Universe might spawn in the distant future (and there is definitely a “next” universe in Doctor Who - according to the DWM comics, it’s filled with beings called Zytragupten)
- I don't fully buy the Time Lords as we see them on screen (at least the ones after The War Games) as FORCES OF NATURE - except perhaps as a collective. The ancient ones like Rassilon and Omega certainly resemble gods, though. And, who knows, maybe the Time Lords we see aren't really the ones who hold the power…
- This line, however, 100% sounds like the Time Lords I know - "the status quo is coded into every cell of their flesh and blood, so it's no shock to learn that their own past interests them as little as their own evolution." And they consider progress beneath them (like most royalty, I guess!)
- The Book says that the most important thing to note about the Great Houses is their sterility, as introduced in the VNAs (and ignored almost everywhere else). Similarly, terms like mother and father are called pre-regenerative terms, but other stories refer to regular family connections between Time Lords. I wonder if the Faction (or the enemy) is behind that, taking away a key aspect of the Great Houses’ identity.
- Also the term Cousin, introduced in Lungbarrow, is called “archaic” - but the cousins in that story were out of time for 700 years...
- Some Newbloods consider time-active species as a class above “Lesser Species” - in the Big Finish Gallifrey series, we see the Temporal Powers having special status.
- The enemy is said to be cultured with an agenda beyond destruction. (Which I initially contasted with the Daleks until I remembered the VNAs mentioned Dalek poetry)
- The “planet (that) would immediately take the Homeworld’s place” passage might be a reference to the Ferutu from Cold Fusion.
- The CIA became the Celestis before the War - in the BF Time War, the CIA lasted into the Time War but was closed in the early stages. Although perhaps...
I can't get it out of my head that Celestis and The Division are the same. Ditto. It was the existence of Mictlan that made me consider it - a bubble outside time is where Tecteun's lab was, after all, even if it was more physical than the Mictlan described here. Division appears to have been a secret faction on Gallifrey, probably within the (similar but less effective) CIA. And there are certainly candidates for membership within the EU... The chapter-less Sardon from World Game, the Director of Allegiance Ferain from Lungbarrow... Perhaps it was those Division CIA members who splintered away and became the Celestis. The entry talks more about how the timeship machines: --aren't vessels (vehicles?) --are described as more biological than we might expect (when thinking of a TARDIS) --they are more for re-writing the biodata of a child of the Great Houses, and
--reprocessing their own futures.
I seem to recall something in the EU about the TARDIS moving the universe, not itself - but it’s entirely possible that I’m just thinking of the explanation of how the Planet Express ship moves in Futurama. Which links very nicely to my “Doctor is a virus that infects fiction” idea. Basically, if the Doctor’s there, the story will inevitably be about the Doctor. Without the Doctor it’s a totally different story. I mean, we have recently learned (in The Timeless Children) that the Doctor may have been injected into their universe from outside… Some other cool ideas: - The Great Houses "perceive themselves as being part of the historical process much more than being a people", the Homeworld is "more a focal-point for causality than an actual place" and the enemy is an "all-consuming process" as well. I like the repeated “not an X, but a Y” construction there. Really frames the Houses and enemy as two sides of the same coin…
- Forced Regen missions are a horrifying idea and I love them
- The Remote are an interesting idea - they want a revolution because it fits the narrative. Good thing people never get worked up into a frenzy by the media on our side of reality!!!!
- The Houses have a "lack of destiny" in the eyes of the post-humans, so cultures on the brink of becoming time active take pride in being lesser.
- The distant future of Frontios is murky and off-limits not because of its distance but because there are so many temporal powers by that point in history that things are very uncertain...
- I definitely thought (from my brief encounters with FP lore) that the Spiral Politic was just "all of time and space," but no it's "the parts of history that matter." (And yeah, as everyone seems to have noted already, it’s a great visual!)
Okay, one more thing before I go: some of the concepts in this really reminded me of a novella I read last year (on the recommendation of a user on the Divergent Universe forum) called This is How You Lose the Time War). I’ll pop this in a spoiler cause it’s a bit of a tangent: In that story, the Time War is between two potential futures - a set of timelines where humanity has become more cybernetic, and a set of timelines where humanity has become more plant-like. Our two protagonists are agents from either side, playing a cat and mouse game while each undoes the other’s temporal machinations, trying to alter the history to make their own future more plausible.
So when I read “The suggestion has been made that the War is turning every culture into a War culture, ensuring that one day every individual in recorded time will be a child of the Houses or a child of the enemy”, all I could think of was those two timelines - what if every individual in history will be a child of the Houses AND a child of the enemy, depending on how the timeline shakes out?
(And there’s an interesting metaphor there… all wars are wars between potential futures in a way!) Alright that's enough for one post I think, lol. Next time I'll try to share my thoughts while I read the Week Two entries...
|
|
|
Post by garyshots on Sept 18, 2022 16:44:22 GMT
And timing-wise, I think it’s safe to say that the War fills the same temporal niche as the Last Great Time War - ie. sometime late in the Eighth Doctor’s life - even if the exact nature of the relation between the Wars is open for debate.
This is merely idle chatter, but I think the Time War is just what replaces the War in Heaven if the Enemy lose and get retro-erased. History abhors a vacuum, so it replaces them with the Daleks. Whereas I think the Great Houses would have ended up allied with the Daleks as the War in Heaven went on and they became more degraded and desperate and began doing crazy stuff like resurrecting Rassilon. The House Military are halfway to being Daleks already.
Rassilon would absolutely make a Molotov–Ribbentrop pack with Davros or the Dalek Emperor, both sides planning to betray the other. By forcing the Enemy to fight on two fronts, he manages to exterminate them from the timeline altogether, just like he did with all the other more creative and interesting possibilities before them. But history abhors a vacuum, and the budding Rassilon/Davros bromance is unwritten so they're at each other's throats again.
Whereas the Faction Paradox timeline seems to be heading ultimately for a defeat of the Great Houses and their replacement by something sexier.
|
|